Clinical Outcomes of Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Sigmoid Colon Cancer: Surgery With 1 Surgeon and 1 Camera Operator
Annals of Coloproctology 2018³â 34±Ç 6È£ p.292 ~ p.298
(Oh Jung-Ryul) - National Cancer Center Center for Colorectal Cancer
¹Ú¼ºÂù(Park Sung-Chan) - National Cancer Center Center for Colorectal Cancer
¹Ú¼º½Ç(Park Sung-Sil) - National Cancer Center Center for Colorectal Cancer
¼Õº´ÈÆ(Sohn Beong-Hoon) - National Cancer Center Center for Colorectal Cancer
(Oh Hyoung-Min) - National Cancer Center Center for Colorectal Cancer
±è¹ø(Kim Bun) - National Cancer Center Center for Colorectal Cancer
±è¹ÎÁß(Kim Min-Jung) - National Cancer Center Center for Colorectal Cancer
ȫâ¿ø(Hong Chang-Won) - National Cancer Center Center for Colorectal Cancer
ÇÑ°æ¼ö(Han Kyung-Su) - National Cancer Center Center for Colorectal Cancer
¼Õ´ë°æ(Sohn Dae-Kyung) - National Cancer Center Center for Colorectal Cancer
¿ÀÀçȯ(Oh Jae-Hwan) - National Cancer Center Center for Colorectal Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: This study compared the perioperative clinical outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) with those of conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for patients with sigmoid colon cancer and investigated the safety and feasibility of RPLS performed by 1 surgeon and 1 camera operator.
Methods: From the beginning of 2010 until the end of 2014, 605 patients underwent a colectomy for sigmoid colon cancer. We compared the characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and pathologic results for the patients who underwent RPLS and for the patients who underwent MPLS. We also compared the clinical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and 3-port laparoscopic surgery.
Results: Of the 115 patients in the RPLS group, 59 underwent SILS and 56 underwent 3-port laparoscopic surgery. The MPLS group included 490 patients. The RPLS group had shorter operating time (137.4 ¡¾ 43.2 minutes vs. 155.5 ¡¾ 47.9 minutes, P < 0.001) and shorter incision length (5.3 ¡¾ 2.2 cm vs. 7.8 ¡¾ 1.2 cm, P < 0.001) than the MPLS group. In analyses of SILS and 3-port laparoscopic surgery, the SILS group showed younger age, longer operating time, and shorter incision length than the 3-port surgery group and exhibited a more advanced T stage, more lymphatic invasion, and larger tumor size.
Conclusion: RPLS performed by 1 surgeon and 1 camera operator appears to be a feasible and safe surgical option for the treatment of patients with sigmoid colon cancer, showing comparable clinical outcomes with shorter operation time and shorter incision length than MPLS. SILS can be applied to patients with favorable tumor characteristics.
Å°¿öµå
Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery, Sigmoid colon cancer, Colectomy, One surgeon plus one camera operator surgery, Three-port surgery
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
RPLS was a feasible and safe surgical option for the treatment of patients with sigmoid colon cancer, showing comparable clinical outcomes with shorter operation time and shorter incision length than MPLS.